Beaders' Ethics
Mindy Brooks
Editor, Bead&Button
editor@beadandbutton.com
When, if ever, is it acceptable to sell or teach another person’s designs?
That’s
a question we hear frequently at Bead&Button, and it tells us that
many of our readers care about the ethical and legal issues involved
when it comes to the money-making aspects of beading. Unfortunately, we
also have firsthand experience with beading’s darker side – the
dishonest few who cause heartache and financial harm by cashing in on
another person’s original work. And when unethical people profit from
ideas that don’t belong to them, it hurts us all.
Maybe
it was inevitable that as beading became more popular, people would
look for shortcuts to exploit the growing number of lucrative
opportunities, and maybe
there
is nothing one editor or one editorial can do to change that. So, it’s
gratifying to know that my concerns about the ethics of beading are
shared by the editors of other beading magazines, including Cathy
Jakicic of BeadStyle, Marlene Blessing of Beadwork, Pamela Hawkins of
BeadUnique, and Leslie Rogalski of Step by Step Beads. They will also
be covering this topic in upcoming issues of their publications.
To address the question presented at the start of this editorial,
Bead&Button’s position on copying designs is as follows:
1. It is unethical to copy an artist’s work to sell without the artist’s permission.
2.
It is unethical to copy any work that has appeared in a magazine, book,
or website and represent it in any venue as an original design.
3. It is unethical to teach a beading project that has appeared in a magazine, book, or website
without the artist’s permission.
4. It is unethical to teach a beading project learned in another teacher’s class without the teacher’s permission.
If
you agree, please help disseminate this message by including a copy of
these statements with your class materials, your kits, and the pieces
you sell. You can download
Mindy Brooks
Editor, Bead&Button
editor@beadandbutton.com